Wednesday, June 23, 2010

All McDonald's Restaurants Deserve a Break Today - from Frivolous Lawsuits

After reading the following post on Facebook, I am compelled to share with you, dear readers.

"Are McDonald's Happy  Meal Toys making your child fat?"  At first glance, my response was, "No, not unless my child is EATING the Happy Meal Toys!"

Snarky comments aside, the article complains, "McDonald's marketing has the effect of conscripting America's children into an unpaid drone army of word-of-mouth marketers, causing them to nag their parents to bring them to McDonald's," according to Stephen Gardner, of the Centre for Science in the Public Interest's consumer group.

All right, I'm rolling my eyes here.  {eye roll}

WHAT DO YOU EXPECT?

This is a fast-food chain.

They cater to people who don't care if they eat healthy meals 3x daily. Or, at least, they cater to people who don't care if they chow down on high-carb, high-fat foods when they're on the road traveling and have no time to stop for a sit-down meal, people who don't mind eating fast-food now and then, etc.

To be fair, McDonald's has tried to upgrade the menu by downgrading the fats and making available the nutrition information for their menu items.

The CSPI group complains that Happy  Meals aren't healthy for kids and the toys are marketed specifically to draw children in, and beg and nag their parents  to take them to McDonald's.   CSPI says "even if those Happy Meals appear in advertisements, kids order the unhealthier meals most of the time."

Get ready: {eye roll} {eye roll}

Who the heck is CSPI to be suing anyone over what toys are put with what fast food meals?  Is Burger King any better?

Dear CSPI,

Instead of filing frivolous lawsuits and wasting the time and money of the court systems and the people who fund them, why don't you try growing a set of gonads and just saying "NO" to your child? 

You can't parent for everyone else in the world, though your efforts are admirable. Certainly we've all felt the urge to parent for those who should have been sterilized at birth (were such a thing possible) due to their lack of judgement and brains.

However, such things being what they are, we can only control ourselves, and to a limited extent, our own brood. 

That being said, if you can say "NO" to your own child, you can be smugly assured that your child, at least, will be eating healthy meals and not playing with cheap plastic toys that are geared toward mass marketing efforts to further encourage your child to force you to take out a loan so you can escort him/her to the movies to view the characters portrayed in these pieces of plastic on the big screen.

It's something we often don't want our children to do, during those golden moments of childhood, but I'm going to say it to you, CSPI: GROW UP. 

YOU are the parent.  YOU have the car keys.  YOU have the checkbook.  YOU have the power to SAY NO.  So start saying it.  Oh, and if you don't like the mass marketing bit, then turn off the damned television.

DUH.

Sincerely,

MomCrusades - (and any other parent or conglomerate who is tired of others insisting that everyone else parent our children and make our decisions)

 
photos: cgi.ebay.com (dolls, cars)
             eatthiscity.com (WTF pic)
             johntracy.com (cheeseburger)
             golf.qwowi.com (golf balls)

8 comments:

  1. no $hit. I read this online and posted it just because it is as stupid as it sounds. And yeah, what about Burger King?? They're just as bad if not worse than McDonalds. As I read it, I was thinking "Sweet merciful crap. You're kidding right?? What happened to Mom or Dad or the grandparents saying 'uh no Johnny...we're not eating that crap tonight. how about dinner at home instead???'" First we foist parental responsibilities upon the schools (e.g. manners, morals and now this bull$hit article the NY Times has about keeping kids from having best friends) and now we're going to sue to protect the stupid? Great. Wonderful. Since when do the kids have control over the pocketbook??? And like you said, parents need to say NO or turn off the damn TV.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Let's not forget that cereals have been putting toys in boxes forever. Thank you for this dose of common sense.

    ReplyDelete
  3. You have hit the nail on the head so well with your blog! No one wants to take responsibility for their actions. It is easier to blame someone else. Next thing you know all the end of isle displays in grocery stores will be removed because parents cannot discipline their children when they throw a temper tantrum for a piece of candy. I wonder if a lawsuit resulted in cereal companies removing toys from their boxes!

    ReplyDelete
  4. HAH! Thanks, Alissa and CALACTX - I completely forgot about cereal box toys. Should we toss in the Cracker Jacks, too?

    I feel that this lawsuit should be stamped "denied" and that group forced to pay back the money spent on the time it took to read through the lawsuit and stamp it "denied." What a waste of time!

    ReplyDelete
  5. I don't have anything to add here b/c I totally agree. How whiney is our generation that we feel compelled to sue someone else for our lazy parenting? I'm with you on this. Just tell the kid no and to stop whining for toys.

    I might be a mean parent though.

    Also I loved your comment on my latest post but when I tried to email you back it wouldn't let me. :(

    ReplyDelete
  6. Bethany - oh no! Re: my comment to your post - I don't know why the email thingie wouldn't work. I'm totally in the dark about the inner workings of the blogging system.

    As for the rest, they can't sue McDonalds over the toys - how else would I get a Shrek watch for myself, then?

    ReplyDelete
  7. Love this post! So true! So many people just don't know how to so NO to their kid. That is where the issue is, not in what to sell. Crazy!

    ReplyDelete
  8. I, of course, agree with you that the toys do not make our children fat and that parents need to exercise better parenting skills and show a little restraint when little Suzy insists that she wants her Happy Meal (and her Ooompa Loompa NOW), - however, I would also point out that a hamburger or cheeseburger at McDonald's are 99 cents.

    Today, one large, fresh peach at my local grocery store was 85 cents.

    The cheeseburger, for many, is the more filling option. And not everyone has the money to buy the healthier alternatives. (Added pressure from kids doesn't make things easier.)

    We never really started the "fast food" thing, so when my son first had it, he asked,"Is this food?" because everything tasted really salty and strange to his palette. He never ever asks for it.

    I just wish that SOMEHOW is these United States of America we could make fresh, locally grown food more available and more affordable to the masses. McDonald's is everywhere, even in the worst neighborhoods. Sometimes people have to go pretty far to find a peach.

    ReplyDelete